Write your message


XML Print


1- Mechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum University of Technology, Abadan, Iran
Abstract:   (116 Views)
This paper proposes a probabilistic model based on machine learning algorithms to estimate the risk associated with different levels of damage (per DNV-RP-F101) due to a dropped-object impact on subsea pipelines. The model is generalized by considering a wide range of pipeline geometric and mechanical specifications, corrosion conditions, and various possible impact scenarios. Multiple machine learning algorithms—including Linear Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, and Gradient Boosting—were evaluated, with Random Forest demonstrating the highest accuracy. The analysis of how pipeline characteristics influence the probability of different damage levels provides a basis for decision-making on implementing preventive measures to reduce damage probability during the pipeline design stage
Full-Text [PDF 1444 kb]   (56 Downloads)    

Highlights:
  • A probability-based framework for evaluating the damage levels in submarine pipelines based on machine learning algorithms is presented.
  • The framework employs Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to generate a generalized data set based on uncertainties and a wide range of pipelines with their geometric and mechanical specifications, corrosion conditions, and various possible conditions of object impact.
  • Using Machine Learning (ML)-based error methods to study the efficiency of different ML algorithms in the predictive model of damage level probability assessment.
  • The study offers an actionable tool for implementing preventive measures in the pipeline design phase.

Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Offshore Structure
Received: 2025/08/23 | Accepted: 2026/04/11

References
1. F. Jiang and S. Dong, (2020), Collision failure risk analysis of falling object on subsea pipelines based on machine learning scheme, Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 114, p. 104601, doi: 10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2020.104601. [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104601]
2. I. H. M. Cech, P. Davis, W. Guijt, A. Haskamp, (2022), Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines. [Online]. Available: https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/Rpt_22-6.pdf
3. G. Xiang, K. Rao, X. Xiang, and X. Yu, (2023), Overview and analysis on recent research and challenges of dropped objects in offshore engineering, Ocean Eng., vol. 281, p. 114616, doi: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2023.114616. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114616]
4. L. Zhang et al., (2023), Mechanical response of dropping a Hall anchor and its penetration depth in riverbed silt, Ocean Eng., vol. 281, p. 114845, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114845. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114845]
5. F. Jiang and E. Zhao, (2025), A study on the failure mechanism of offshore pipelines with corrosion defects subjected to impact loads from falling objects, Ocean Eng., vol. 318, p. 120119, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120119. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120119]
6. V. Aanesland, (1987), Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Accidentally Falling Drilling Pipes, doi: 10.4043/5497-MS. [DOI:10.4043/5497-MS] []
7. M. R. U. Kawsar, S. A. Youssef, M. Faisal, A. Kumar, J. K. Seo, and J. K. Paik, (2015), Assessment of dropped object risk on corroded subsea pipeline, Ocean Eng., vol. 106, pp. 329-340, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.056. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.056]
8. DNV-RP-F107, Risk assessment of pipeline protection.
9. S. T. Edmollaii, P. Edalat, and M. Dyanati, (2019), Reliability sensitivity analysis of dropped object on submarine pipelines, Ocean Syst. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, doi: 10.12989/ose.2019.9.2.135.
10. Y. Zhou and S. Zhang, (2022), Perforation analysis and limit prediction of submarine pipelines subjected to extreme impact loadings, Ocean Eng., vol. 246, p. 110651, doi: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.110651. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110651]
11. F. Jiang and S. Dong, (2022), Two-level quantitative risk analysis of submarine pipelines from dropped objects considering pipe-soil interaction, Ocean Eng., vol. 257, p. 111620, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111620. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111620]
12. K. Park, G. Lee, C. Kim, J. Kim, K. Rhie, and W. B. Lee, (2020), Comprehensive framework for underground pipeline management with reliability and cost factors using Monte Carlo simulation, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 63, p. 104035, Jan., doi: 10.1016/J.JLP.2019.104035. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104035]
13. R. Aulia, H. Tan, and S. Sriramula, (2021), Dynamic reliability model for subsea pipeline risk assessment due to third-party interference" J. Pipeline Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 277-289, doi: 10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.006]
14. X. Li, J. Wang, R. Abbassi, and G. Chen, (2022), A risk assessment framework considering uncertainty for corrosion-induced natural gas pipeline accidents, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 75, p. 104718, doi: 10.1016/J.JLP.2021.104718. [DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104718]
15. C. I. Ossai, (2013), Pipeline Corrosion Prediction And Reliability Analysis: A Systematic Approach With Monte Carlo Simulation And Degradation Models, Int. J. Sci. & Technol. Res., vol. 2, pp. 58-69, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:111115779
16. A. Durap and C. E. Balas, (2022), Risk assessment of submarine pipelines: A case study in Turkey, Ocean Eng., vol. 261, p. 112079, Oct., doi: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.112079. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112079]
17. L. Balas and E. �zhan, (2000), An implicit three-dimensional numerical model to simulate transport processes in coastal water bodies, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 307-339, doi: 10.1002/1097-0363 (20001030) 34:4 < 307::AID-FLD63>3.0.CO;2-T. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0363(20001030)34:4<307::AID-FLD63>3.0.CO;2-T [DOI:10.1002/1097-0363(20001030)34:43.0.CO;2-T]
18. Y. Tian et al., (2021), Assessment of submarine pipeline damages subjected to falling object impact considering the effect of seabed, Mar. Struct., vol. 78, p. 102963, doi: 10.1016 / J.MARSTRUC.2021.102963. [DOI:10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.102963]
19. W. Chen, F. Wan, F. Guan, X. Liu, Y. Yang, and C. Zhou, (2024), The effect of seabed flexibility on the impact damage behavior of submarine sandwich pipes, Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 142, p. 103838, doi: 10.1016/J.APOR.2023.103838. [DOI:10.1016/j.apor.2023.103838]
20. F. Jiang and S. Dong, (2020), Collision failure risk analysis of falling object on subsea pipelines based on machine learning scheme, Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 114, p. 104601, doi: 10.1016 / j.engfailanal.2020.104601. [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104601]
21. A. M. Al-Sabaeei, H. Alhussian, S. J. Abdulkadir, and A. Jagadeesh, (2023), Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review, Energy Reports, vol. 10, pp. 1313-1338, doi: 10.1016 /j.egyr . 2023.08.009. [DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.009]
22. R.E. Melchers, (2015), Progression of pitting corrosion and structural reliability of welded steel pipelines Oil Gas Pipelines, Oil and Gas Pipelines, R. W. Revie, Ed. Wiley, pp. 327-342. doi: 10.1002/9781119019213. [DOI:10.1002/9781119019213]
23. F. Caleyo, J. C. Velázquez, A. Valor, and J. M. Hallen, (2009), Probability distribution of pitting corrosion depth and rate in underground pipelines: A Monte Carlo study, Corros. Sci., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1925-1934, doi: 10.1016/j.corsci .2009.05.019. [DOI:10.1016/j.corsci.2009.05.019]
24. Z. Wang, N. Pedroni, I. Zentner, and E. Zio, (2018), Seismic fragility analysis with artificial neural networks: Application to nuclear power plant equipment, Eng. Struct., vol. 162, pp. 213-225, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct .2018.02.024. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.024]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.