Write your message


XML Print


1- PhD Student, Water and Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering-University of Tehran
2- Professor at University of Tabriz ,Ph.D, P.E., M.ASCEVisiting Associate Professor at University of Warwick, Associate
Abstract:   (66 Views)
Oil spills represent a critical source of marine pollution with profound environmental, economic, and social ramifications. This numerical study investigates the interaction between sea waves and oil slicks using ANSYS AQWA software to elucidate the dynamics of oil pollution distribution under wave action. The research examines three pollution mass models with varying dimensions under different wave approach angles (0°, 30°, and 60°) utilizing second-order Stokes wave theory. The investigation reveals that displacement of the pollution mass center decreases with increasing wave angle. Maximum displacement and mobility increase proportionally with expanding oil slick dimensions at constant mass. Wave-induced forces on pollution masses exhibit inverse correlation with wave angle. Forces from irregular waves exceed those from regular Stokes waves by approximately 20% for larger pollution masses. For expanded oil slicks, irregular wave forces can reach up to three times the magnitude of regular wave forces. These findings provide crucial insights for oil spill response planning, containment system design, and environmental impact assessment in marine environments.
 
 
Full-Text [PDF 901 kb]   (12 Downloads)    

Highlights

  1. A comprehensive numerical framework was developed to investigate wave–oil slick interactions using ANSYS AQWA under regular and irregular wave conditions.
  2. Wave approach angle significantly controls oil slick displacement and hydrodynamic loading, with displacement decreasing as the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°.
  3. Larger oil slicks exhibit greater mobility and experience substantially higher wave-induced forces compared with smaller pollution masses.
  4. Irregular (JONSWAP) waves generate considerably larger hydrodynamic forces than regular Stokes waves, reaching up to three times higher values for large slicks.
    5. 
    The obtained results provide practical insights for oil spill trajectory prediction, containment system design, and marine environmental impact assessment.


 


Type of Study: Research Paper | Subject: Numerical Investigation
Received: 2025/09/4 | Accepted: 2026/05/30

References
1. [1] Chao, X., Shankar, N.J., & Cheong, H.F. (2001). Two-and three-dimensional oil spill model for coastal waters. Ocean Engineering, 28(12), 1557-1573. [DOI:10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00027-0]
2. [2] Abascal, A.J., Castanedo, S., Gutierrez, A.D., Comerma, E., Medina, R., & Losada, I.J. (2007). TESEO: An operational system for simulating oil spill trajectories and fate processes. ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
3. [3] Chen, H.Z., Li, D.M., & Li, X. (2007). Mathematical modeling of oil spill on the sea and application of the modeling in Daya Bay. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 19(3), 282-291. [DOI:10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60060-2]
4. [4] Wang, S.D., Shen, Y.M., Guo, Y.K., & Tang, J. (2008). Three-dimensional numerical simulation for transport of oil spills in seas. Ocean Engineering, 35(5-6), 503-510. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.12.001]
5. [5] Guo, W.J., & Wang, Y.X. (2009). A numerical oil spill model based on a hybrid method. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(5), 726-734. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.12.015] [PMID]
6. [6] Nagheeby, M., & Kolahdoozan, M. (2010). Numerical modeling of two-phase fluid flow and oil slick transport in estuarine water. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 7, 771-784. [DOI:10.1007/BF03326186]
7. [7] Heydariha, J.Z., & Ghiassi, R. (2010). Oil spill simulation in the mouth of the Persian Gulf. Advances in Waste Management, 56-60.
8. [8] Mariano, A., et al. (2011). On the modeling of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 52(1-2), 322-340. [DOI:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2011.06.001]
9. [9] Hou, T., Sun, H., Jiao, B., Wang, G., Lin, H., Liu, H., & Gao, B. (2024). Numerical and experimental study of oil boom motion response and oil-stopping effect under wave-current action. Ocean Engineering, 291, 116439. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116439]
10. [10] Feng, X., Liu, Y., Wei, Q., Su, J., Zhang, D., Zhou, Z., Wu, W., Xiong, C., & Peng, S. (2024). Numerical simulations on the oil plume evolutions and the two critical aspects of emergent oil containment for ship collision-incurred oil spills. Ocean Engineering, 305, 118030. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118030]
11. [11] Dąbrowska, E. (2024). Numerical Modelling and Prediction of Oil Slick Dispersion and Horizontal Movement at Bornholm Basin in Baltic Sea. Water, 16(8), 1088. [DOI:10.3390/w16081088]
12. [12] Putrananda, M.B.S., Bahatmaka, A., Aryadi, W., Puteri, B.A., & Hutagalung, C.I. (2025). Numerical Analysis of Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Response of Trimaran Semi-Submersible Ship. Mekanika: Majalah Ilmiah Mekanika, 24(1), 61-72. [DOI:10.20961/mekanika.v24i1.99057]
13. [13] Nguyen, T.T., Phan, T.L., & Le, T.H. (2025). Numerical Study on the Motion and Wave Loads of an Uncrewed Surface Vehicle Catamaran at Low Speed in Sea Waves. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 18(9), 2321-2331. [DOI:10.47176/jafm.18.9.3330]
14. [14] Arjomand, M.A., Bagheri, M., & Mostafaei, Y. (2025). Performance Enhancement of Tuned Liquid Dampers in Fixed Offshore Platforms: A Coupled ANSYS Aqwa-Transient Structural Approach. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 1(1), 77-88.
15. [15] Paiva, M.S., Mocellin, A.P.G., Oleinik, P.H., Santos, E.D., Rocha, L.A.O., Isoldi, L.A., & Machado, B.N. (2025). Geometrical Evaluation of an Overtopping Wave Energy Converter Device Subject to Realistic Irregular Waves and Representative Regular Waves of the Sea State That Occurred in Rio Grande-RS. Processes, 13(2), 335. [DOI:10.3390/pr13020335]
16. [16] Wang, P., Yu, W., Zhao, M., & Du, X. (2024). Effects of wind-wave-current-earthquake interaction on the wave height and hydrodynamic pressure based on CFD method. Ocean Engineering, 305, 117909. [DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117909]
17. [17] Constantin, A. (2016). Extrema of the dynamic pressure in an irrotational regular wave train. Physics of Fluids, 28(11), 113604. [DOI:10.1063/1.4967362]
18. [18] Chakrabarti, S. (2005). Handbook of Offshore Engineering (2-volume set). Elsevier.
19. [19] McGovern, D.J., & Bai, W. (2014). Experimental study on kinematics of sea ice floes in regular waves. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 103, 15-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.004]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Maritime Technology is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.